[The best selling] grumpy cat all i want for christmas is to punch you ugly christmas sweater

To say the least, this resulting reversal of roles is legally unusual grumpy cat all i want for christmas is to punch you ugly christmas sweater since the Ombudsman is the body formally established and designated

grumpy cat all i want for christmas is to punch you ugly christmas sweater

the Truth Commission – whose express mandate is to search out and “tell the reality” can not but make a difference within the public perception. grumpy cat all i want for christmas is to punch you ugly christmas sweater At this level in the political growth of the nation, the public is already a very critical viewers who can examine announced outcomes and may kind its personal conclusions concerning the culpability or innocence of the investigated persons, regardless of what conclusions investigative commissions could arrive at. This is a actuality that cannot be doubted as the public has been uncovered in the past to these investigative commissions. The effects of truth-telling might transcend those that have an effect on the Ombudsman.

If the Ombudsman concurs with the Commission and brings the beneficial graft and corruption charges before the Sandiganbayan – a constitutionally-established court – this court docket itself would be topic to the identical fact-telling challenge if it decides to acquit the accused. For that matter, even this Court, shall be perceived to have sided with an “untruth” when and if it goes towards the Commission’s report. Thus, the authority, independence, and even the integrity of these constitutional bodies – the Ombudsman, the Sandiganbayan, and the Supreme Court – would have been successfully compromised, to the unfairness of the justice system. All these, of course, begin with the premise that the Truth Commission has the mandate to find the “truth,” as it name implies, and has a truth-telling function that it can fully exercise by way of its own efforts and thru the media. In different phrases, faced with the findings of the Commission, the Ombudsman who enters a opposite ruling effectively carries the burden of proving that its findings, not those of the Commission, are right.