itself impermissibly limiting this energy when the item ic xc nika Jesus Christ all over printed ugly christmas sweater of the train of the Presidential powers of investigation under EO 1 centered on the reported misdeeds of the Arroyo administration.
ic xc nika Jesus Christ all over printed ugly christmas sweater
On the primary test. Is the classification affordable, based mostly on substantial distinctions that make for real difference? The government has already given several explanation ic xc nika Jesus Christ all over printed ugly christmas sweater why the distinction between the administration of President Arroyo is different from different previous administrations. The distinction does not lie in any declare that corruption is the only real hallmark of the Arroyo administration – far from it. The distinction lies in reason – administrative constraints, availability of proof, immediate previous acts, non-prescription of causes of actions – all of which aren’t whimsical, contrived, superficial or irrelevant. It should even be emphasized that the Court,
as quoted above, recognizes that in many instances, the classification lies in slender distinctions. We have already mentioned how in Luna v. Sarmiento the Court recognized subclasses within a class and upheld the slender distinction made by Congress between these subclasses. So if past administrations have already been the subject of a truth-finding commission, whereas one particular administration has not been so subjected, that alone is a good basis for making a distinction between them and an administration that has not but been investigated. It must be emphasised that the Victoriano case, which the majority heavily relied on, reiterated that as long as there is a public benefit to be obtained in a authorities motion, incidental advantage to a bunch just isn’t sufficient to upset the presumption of constitutionality of a government motion. Having strongly expounded on the necessity of President Aquino to meet his political contract with the Filipino folks to deal with graft and corruption, and his constitutional duty to make sure that the legal guidelines are faithfully executed, the Court all of a sudden finds