[The best selling] national football league washington redskins crocband clog

These principles prohibit a State from compelling any individual to affirm his belief in God national football league washington redskins crocband clog or to associate with a political party … as a condition of retaining public employment.

national football league washington redskins crocband clog

activities are not so related to the Union’s representational duties to employees in the objecting employees’ bargaining unit as to justify their compelled financial support of them. national football league washington redskins crocband clog Finally, the Charging Party, in her exceptions brief, argues that requiring the Union to provide an audit verification letter would prevent the Union “from blurring the lines between chargeable and non-chargeable expenses.” This assertion confuses the issue. As the Board stated in KGW Radio, supra, “the function of the auditor is to verify that the expenditures that the union claims it made were in fact made for the purposes claimed, not to pass on the correctness of the union’s allocation of expenditures to the chargeable and nonchargeable categories

.”22 The Charging Party’s assertion goes not to the veracity of the underlying expenditure figures, but to the Union’s chargeability designations, which are properly contested via the Union’s challenge procedure. An audit verification letter would not provide objectors with any new or useful information regarding chargeability. In contrast to the procedure at issue in L-3, the UAW provides much more extensive notice of the annual renewal requirement to objectors than only once a year in its magazine. As described above, each UAW objector received at least four notices of the requirement over the course of a year.10 And an objector who fails to renew on time promptly receives a reminder of the need to act in order to regain objector status. The issue in this case is whether, in the context of their Beck procedures1 as a whole, the Respondent Unions’ rule requiring potential objectors to renew their objections on an annual basis violates the duty of fair representation.