[The best selling] skull the united states air force camo full over printed shirt

Over the entire range of SICs affected by the final rule, skull the united states air force camo full over printed shirt estimated cost per small firm averages only $31.63. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act , this section measures

skull the united states air force camo full over printed shirt

for the partial industry classification exemption. 1904.42 Requests from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for data. In accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), skull the united states air force camo full over printed shirt Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations (40 CFR part 1500 et seq.), and the Department of Labor’s NEPA regulations , the Assistant Secretary has determined that this final rule will not have a significant impact on the external environment. Based on OSHA’s analysis of small business impacts (Tables X-11 and X-12), OSHA certifies that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. OSHA makes this certification to fulfill its obligations under the Regulatory Flexibility Act .

The compliance requirements of the final rule. The compliance requirements of the final rule are discussed in the summary and explanation section of the preamble, which discusses each requirement in detail. The number of small entities to which the rule will apply. As shown in Table X-11, the final rule will impact 541,988 firms defined as small firms by the SBA. Need for and objectives of the rule. The need for the final rule and its objectives are discussed in the introductory sections of the preamble. A description of the steps the Agency has taken to minimize the significant economic impact on small entities consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, including a statement of the factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative adopted in the final rule and why each of the other significant alternatives considered by the agency was rejected. The results of this analysis are shown in Table X-11.